| What's Wrong with Medical Research?: Handout
Thornley, Ben, and Adams, Clive "Content and quality of 2000 controlled
trials in schizophrenia over 50 years" British Medical Journal
1998; 317: 1181-1184.
Overview of research studies
- Studies published between 1948 and 1997.
- Patients with schizophrenia and other non-affective psychoses.
Variety of interventions
- Drugs (e.g., anti-psychotics and anti-depressants)
- Therapy (e.g., individual, group, and family)
- Miscellaneous (e.g., electroconvulsive treatments)
Four difficulties
1. Types of patients
- The ideal study would be community based.
- Only 14% of actual studies were community based.
2. Number of patients
- The ideal study should include at least 300 patients.
- The average number was only 65 patients.
- Only 3% of studies met the target of 300 or more patients.
3. Length of the studies
- The ideal study should last at least six months.
- More than half of the studies lasted six weeks or less.
- Only 19% of the studies met the target of six months or more
duration.
4. Measurement
- The ideal studies should concentrate on a small number of
standard measures.
- These studies employed 640 different measures.
- There were 369 measures that were used once and never used again.
Conclusions
Much of the work in schizophrenia failed to meet appropriate research
standards. Too many of the studies...
- examined the wrong patients,
- studied too few patients,
- ended too soon,
- used fragmentary measurements.
Research in schizophrenia leaves much room for improvement.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 United States License. It was written by Steve Simon on 2000-05-04, edited by Steve
Simon, and was last modified on
2008-01-11. This page needs minor
revisions. Category:
Statistical evidence |